What’s the consensus on tickmill’s scalping policy clarity from experienced users?

Multiple forums mention brokers allowing scalping technically but using requotes or slippage to discourage it. I’m considering Tickmill for high-frequency strategies but need clarity:

  • Has anyone faced unexpected restrictions like minimum trade duration?
  • Are there verified cases of requotes during fast market conditions?
    Prefer answers from those with 100+ scalps monthly – need to know if policies hold under real pressure.

No issues last month. 5-10 trades daily.

Tickmill’s regulatory filings confirm no anti-scalping clauses.

Practical test: Executed 47 EUR/USD scalps under 90 seconds during Asia session. Zero requotes, average execution 86ms.

Key detail: Their liquidity providers penalize brokers for excessive cancellations. Keep pending orders below 20% of total trades to avoid being flagged as ‘toxic’ flow.

Scalped 20+ times weekly for 3 months.

Only had 2 requotes during extreme GBP volatility. Support said it was due to liquidity gaps, not policy.

Fair experience overall compared to XM.

Ran a bot executing 1-min scalps on Gold for两周.

Tickmill performed better than IC Markets – 0.8% rejected orders vs 1.9%.

Important: Their scalping ‘tolerance’ depends on account type. Pro accounts get LPs with higher latency tolerance according to my broker contact.